The group also needs to pay for ammunition, weapons, and defection and corruption fees to opposing fighters and leaders. Even a monthly fighter salary of $150 for 3,000 fighters would amount to $450,000 per month in total wages to fighters on the payroll and more than $5 million per year, with leadership earning significantly higher sums. The Taliban pay salaries to their fighters and their leaders, the latter of which is likely a significant line item, as most terrorist leaders demand (or at least aspire to) great personal wealth. Here, it is critical to remember that revenue does not equal profit, and the more the group expands, the greater its expenses become. All of these funding sources amount to a significant revenue stream for the group-one that has clearly enabled them to mount and equip an effective fighting force.īut the Taliban also have extensive costs they have to float, something that is sometimes omitted from analyses of the group’s finances. The Taliban are also believed to provide security for processing labs and for shipments of chemicals required to make heroin, a form of vertical integration. The opium trade is a particularly lucrative source of funds, and reports suggest that the Taliban’s involvement varies significantly, from one of simple taxation to using fighters to harvest poppies to demanding protection money from opium traffickers. This includes collecting customs revenues at border crossings, road taxes, and control or taxation of natural and farmed resources.
The Taliban tax and extort basically all the economic activity within their area of control. A closer look at these funding sources reveals a host of diverse activities that vary by region within Afghanistan. These methods can be broadly categorized into taxation and extortion activities, state sponsorship, donations from wealthy individuals, kidnapping for ransom, and, of course, the drug trade. Traditional analyses of the Taliban’s finances have focused primarily on how the group raises money. What the Research Community Thinks It Knows About Taliban Finance Triangulating different approaches to estimating the Taliban’s revenue streams (and associated expenses), understanding their storage and management of funds, and identifying fund movement methods will help develop a more nuanced (and balanced) picture of the Taliban’s financial health-and associated vulnerabilities. Understanding all aspects of the Taliban’s financial situation allows for greater nuance in developing policy responses to the group, particularly in terms of understanding the utility of sanctions and financial exclusion, which may be needed in order to incentivize regional actors to cooperate and adhere to global norms, and how sometimes adversarial actors such as Russia, China and Pakistan can be important allies (or spoilers). As the Taliban shift from a non-state actor to a state-based one, the group takes on greater expenses in terms of salary, territorial control and state administration. The lack of precise knowledge on these fronts prevents the international community from developing effective policy responses and levers to the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan, and can lead to politicized and inflated estimates of their financial prowess. Even public understanding of Taliban revenues suffers from lack of precision. Researchers do have a high-level understanding of how the Taliban raise funds, but much less is known about how the group uses, moves, stores, manages and obscures its funds. This has naturally led to questions about how the group managed to do it-and about how they were funded. Last week, the Taliban effectively took control of most of Afghanistan.
0 kommentar(er)
